Services

Editorial XML validation

Human review of structure, metadata, references, tables, and figures on JATS XML — complementary to automated validation.

Request a quote

The problem

XML can be XSD-valid and still fail editorial criteria: incomplete affiliations, inconsistent refs, or mislinked figures.

Our solution

We combine technical validation with academic editorial judgment to reduce platform rejections and speed publication.

Review scope

  1. 01

    Document structure

    Front matter, sections, tables, and figures.

  2. 02

    Metadata

    Authors, ORCID, affiliations, abstracts, and keywords.

  3. 03

    References

    Typographic consistency and citation markup.

  4. 04

    Report

    Prioritized findings with suggested fixes.

Deliverables

  • Editorial validation report
  • Priority correction list
  • Annotated XML (when applicable)
  • Profile recommendations (JATS / SciELO / PMC)

FAQ

Is this the same as the validator professional report?

The professional report automates technical findings. Editorial validation adds human review and optional correction.

Request editorial validation

Send a sample article and we will outline scope and timeline.

Request a quote